Where the twelve-month attrition actually landed this quarter
Retention read across sectors and seniority bands, drawn from placements followed past the start date rather than to the offer.
Draft. Figures marked like this are illustrative and pending verification against Recruise placement data & Sachith sign-off before publication.
Key takeaways
- This read follows placements past the start date, not to the offer — retention measured where it actually happens.
- The attrition wasn’t uniform: it concentrated by sector and by seniority band in ways the headline figure hides.
- The most fragile joins were senior hires into scopes that had shifted between offer and start.
We measured retention, not placement.
Most recruiting numbers stop at the offer — a placement is booked and the story ends. This read starts where that one stops. We followed the joins past their start dates and into the year that follows, because the only retention figure worth anything is the one measured after the honeymoon, when the seat has revealed what it actually is.
Read that way, the quarter’s attrition wasn’t a single number. It was a distribution — and the shape of the distribution says more than the average ever could. Some bands held firm; others quietly bled the joins you most wanted to keep.
“We track people past the start date, not to the offer. A placement that leaves inside the year was never a win — it was a cost that took twelve months to show up.”
Sachith Rai · MD & Founder, Recruise
Where it concentrated — sector and band.
The retention held best where scopes were stable and mandates were described plainly at hire. It thinned where the market ran hottest and where the gap between the sold role and the delivered role was widest — predictably, the senior bands into fast-moving functions, where a reorg between offer and start could quietly redraw the job someone thought they’d accepted.
We’re holding the sector-by-sector and band-by-band figures back until they clear sign-off — the full split will publish with the verified data attached, not before. The pattern, though, is already clear enough to act on: the fragile join is the senior one whose scope moved after they said yes, and that’s a hiring problem you can fix upstream.
One pattern worth knowing, every week.
The Signal is our weekly read on the senior GCC talent market — one chart, one pattern, no noise. Written from live placement data.
More from Recruise Insights.
The 18-month exit cliff is real. The cause isn't what HR thinks.
Across the GCCs we track, senior attrition clusters at a predictable point. The triggers group into four things — and only two are inside HR’s control.
Counter-offers are working again. Quietly.
Counter-offer bite rates have moved. The market signal beneath that number matters more than the number itself.
The eighteen-month exit cliff, and what sits under it
Senior joins that leave cluster around the same point. The cause was usually written into the offer, not the onboarding.